• +94773088840
  • +94774421597
  • +94768268170
  • +94774410782
  • +94768268168
  • +94766759393

logo

  • Welcome to IMC
  • Facilities at IMC
  • Vitebsk State Medical University
  • Gomel State Medical University
  • Grodno State Medical University

I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

  • Peoples' Friendship University (RUDN)
  • Pirogov National Research Medical University
  • Melaka Manipal Medical College
  • Quest International University – QIU
  • International Medical School - MSU
  • International Medical University – IMU
  • Lincoln University College
  • Newcastle University Medicine
  • MAHSA University
  • Kathmandu Medical College
  • Manipal College of Medical Sciences
  • SRM Institute of Science and Technology
  • Riga Stradins University
  • Pre University
  • Pre Medicine
  • Biotechnology
  • Bio Medical Science
  • Medical Licensing
  • Online Application

bed study table

First Moscow State Medical University is a QS World Ranked university by subject ranking #451 – 500, BRICS Ranking #=115 and EECA University Rankings of #154.

This is the oldest leading medical university in Russia that has become a cradle of most medical schools and scientific societies. For decades, it has been unofficially known as “First Med”. The Sechenov University is the only member of the Russian Academic Excellence Project in QS World University Ranking by Subject (Medicine).

Medical Degree (Doctor of Medicine)

The 6-year Doctor of Medicine (MD) program offered at the Sechenov University is one of the best English medium programs offered in Russia using actual human cadavers with extensive clinical training in state hospitals. They also have their own clinical campus which was established in 1897.

The university is considered as one of the best in Europe and its teaching hospitals have 3,000+ hospital beds, 20 research & teaching buildings, 25 university clinics at the university hospital and more than 30% of High-Tech Da Vinci Robotic Surgeries. Many renowned scientists and physicians have already worked at the university who are known for their significant contributions in the progress of medicine.

Dentistry Program (Dental Doctor)

A special resonance can be given to First Moscow’s Dentistry Program as it is the only Dentistry Program that’s accepted by Sri-Lanka Medical Council. Sri-Lankan students willing to study Dentistry can opt to study Dentistry at First Moscow University. The Dentistry program is focused on training of dental doctors who’s able to be self-dependent professional Practise in dentistry.

In the program the training is practise-oriented and is aimed at formation of common cultural and professional competencies which let carrying out preventive, diagnostic, treatment and rehabilitation dental procedures, provide psychological, pedagogical, organizational and managerial technologies in healthcare. Teaching systems through laboratories, equipped with high-tech equipment, interactive study technologies, use of multimedia equipment and interest communication, practical training with the help of simulation technologies as well as clinics.

Send Quick Inquiry

Highest Qualification O/Level A/S Level A/Level Bachelor's

*Note Above fee is inclusive of tuition, accommodation, health insurance, medical test & does not include student’s personal expenses such as food.

Entry Criteria – MD | Dentistry

English requirement.

Credit pass for English in O/Levels or A/Levels.

Note – Students who wish to appear for the ACT16/ERPM in Sri Lanka to obtain the registration on Sri Lanka Medical Council to practice medicine in Sri Lanka should fulfill the Minimum Advanced Level entry criteria (C,C,S for Local A/L Examination and C,C,D for London A/L Examination in the subjects Biology, Chemistry and Physics) stipulated by the Sri Lanka medical Council (SLMC).

Academic Pathway

bed study table

*Note – In order to “Practice Medicine” medical graduates are required to pass the relevant “Medical Licensing Examination” in the respective countries.

– IMC Education assists in arranging “Internships” and preparing students for “Medical Licensing Examinations” with the affiliation of our global partners for students who wish to work overseas straight after the Medical degree without coming back to Sri-Lanka

Why I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University?

Recognition and accreditation.

In particular resonance to “Medical Education” the “Recognition and Accreditation” takes due responsibility in determining the future career prospects and its long term influence. The MD programme is fully accredited by the following institutions,

Facilities.

  • Clinical exposure through High tech facilities such as (Da Vinci Robotic Surgeries)
  • Center for Scientific Career – an opportunity to improve skills in writing and performing research activities
  • Simulation Laboratories – for hands on clinical experience.
  • Central Scientific Library – Russia’s best Centers of Library Information Technologies Development.
  • Library is a member of the International Federation of Library Association – biggest European centers of scientific medical data.
  • Enormous student auditoriums and lecture rooms.
  • Comfortable for petite cabin rooms for 1:10 teacher student ratio for teaching.
  • Full functional Indoor and Outdoor sporting complex “Burevestnik”
  • University social student clubs and organizations to support the community
  • Sechenov university summer camps for students who stay in Russia for summer vacation
  • Own Culture Center “New Art” – Events for talent showcasing
  • Comfortable learning environment – Individual counseling schedule.
  • Fully facilitated accommodation

Accommodation

The I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University provides residential living that encourages the academic, social and development of each student.

The University offers comfortable and cozy accommodation to all international students. The rooms are provided on sharing basis of same genders. The rooms are fully furnished with central heating and cooling system.

The University also provides laundry facility along with a kitchen on every floor giving students the option of self-cooking.

Why choose IMC Education for I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University?

  • ONLY institute that has a collaboration with MOS Lanka Investments and the Russian Center – Colombo, Cultural Section of The Russian Embassy .
  • Possess a Sri-Lankan office which helps for all admission support and work.
  • Lodging the application.
  • Guidance in obtaining SLMC clearance letters.
  • Conducting a FREE comprehensive Pre University Preparation (Pre Med) program until semester commencement to gain competitive edge among other students.
  • Comprehensive training to prepare and pass the “University Entrance Examination”
  • Assisting in student visa process.
  • Assisting in Air ticket arrangements for student.
  • University hostel accommodation arrangements.
  • Assisting students in USMLE exam training (USA) / AMC exam training (AUS) through our global partners.
  • Guidance to select the best ACT16/ERPM trainers in Sri Lanka on completion of the medical degree.
  • Possess representatives in Moscow to look after student welfare.
  • Airport pick up.
  • Accommodation arrangement before their arrival.
  • Arranging Visas, Accommodation & Airport pickup for Parents visiting students
  • Assist settling in Moscow. E.g. – purchasing essential items on arrival.
  • Accompanying students in “Medical Tests” at clinics & “University Registration” upon arrival.
  • Assisting the students in medical emergencies to consult health professionals
  • Assist in “Final Degree, Certification” by relevant authorities in Moscow. (MANDATORY to get final certificate validated.
  • Coordinating with University & IMC Office, Colombo to overcome issues related to Academic Support.
  • Any other services required by the students within our scope of work in Moscow.

Career Outcomes

Sechenov University provides Master’s, Ph.D., and Residency level degree programmes. If students wish to continue studies, students may wish to continue to do so (Russian Medium)

The career of a doctor involves training further in the medical degree. If students wish to practice medicine, The MD program offered by I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University is truly an International degree that gives all graduates the chance to study at one of the world’s top medical schools and graduate with a qualification to practice medicine in UK, USA, Australia and etc.  As listed on the World Directly of Medical Schools under WHO, Medical qualification of First Moscow is recognized by multiple medical boards all around the world hence possibility to take up careers anywhere in the world.

Student who wish to pursue a medical career in Sri-Lanka, could successfully opt for the medical licensing examination of the ACT16 / ERPM (Examination to Register & Practice Medicine in Sri-Lanka) while attending support lectures for the examination. IMC Education provides special assistance with regards medical licensing examinations for UK, USA, Australia and Sri-Lanka for career outcomes.

If students wish to be conferred with a “SPECIALIST DEGREE” in Surgery, Paediatrics, Obstetrics, Psychiatry or any other, they must undertake further studies.

Training For Licensing Exams

With the objective of “Nurturing Caring Minds for the World” IMC Education assists students to appear for the  Medical Licensing Examinations   all around the world.

If the graduates wish to practise medicine in Sri Lanka upon successful completion of their medical degree abroad, IMC Education guides the students to find the best ERPM training consultants in Sri lanka to gain necessary competencies required to appear for ERPM/ACT16 exam.

Also IMC Education is affiliated to the best Australian Medical Council Examination trainers in Australia. Thus we would be able to direct the students for such trainers if they wish to appear for the Australian Medical Council Examination (AMC) with the view of practice medicine in Australia.

IMC is affiliated to Kaplan Medical which is the best trainer for United State Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE) and our students will be able to take part in these training programs if they wish to practice medicine in the USA.

TESTIMONIALS

bed study table

Student Video Testimonials

bed study table

Student Written Testimonials

bed study table

Parent Written Testimonials

Other universities.

bed study table

IMC Education (Pvt) Ltd, also known as the International Medical Campus (IMC), Sri Lanka’s undisputed leader in overseas Medical Placements to world’s leading Medical Universities.

Useful Links

  • Learning Management System
  • Customer Management System
  • Engineeing l Science l Business - AIC
  • Terms & condition

bed study table

IMC Education advices the students who wish to practice medicine in Sri Lanka to strictly adhere to the minimum entry criteria and standards stipulated by Sri Lanka Medical Council (SLMC) in selecting Medical universities overseas.

  • Reference Manager
  • Simple TEXT file

People also looked at

Original research article, efficient data-driven machine learning models for scour depth predictions at sloping sea defences.

www.frontiersin.org

  • 1 UCD School of Civil Engineering, UCD Dooge Centre for Water Resources Research and UCD Earth Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
  • 2 School of Engineering, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom

Seawalls are critical defence infrastructures in coastal zones that protect hinterland areas from storm surges, wave overtopping and soil erosion hazards. Scouring at the toe of sea defences, caused by wave-induced accretion and erosion of bed material imposes a significant threat to the structural integrity of coastal infrastructures. Accurate prediction of scour depths is essential for appropriate and efficient design and maintenance of coastal structures, which serve to mitigate risks of structural failure through toe scouring. However, limited guidance and predictive tools are available for estimating toe scouring at sloping structures. In recent years, Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning (ML) algorithms have gained interest, and although they underpin robust predictive models for many coastal engineering applications, such models have yet to be applied to scour prediction. Here we develop and present ML-based models for predicting toe scour depths at sloping seawall. Four ML algorithms, namely, Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosted Decision Trees (GBDT), Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), and Support Vector Machine Regression (SVMR) are utilised. Comprehensive physical modelling measurement data is utilised to develop and validate the predictive models. A Novel framework for feature selection, feature importance, and hyperparameter tuning algorithms are adopted for pre- and post-processing steps of ML-based models. In-depth statistical analyses are proposed to evaluate the predictive performance of the proposed models. The results indicate a minimum of 80% prediction accuracy across all the algorithms tested in this study and overall, the SVMR produced the most accurate predictions with a Coefficient of Determination ( r 2 ) of 0.74 and a Mean Absolute Error (MAE) value of 0.17. The SVMR algorithm also offered most computationally efficient performance among the algorithms tested. The methodological framework proposed in this study can be applied to scouring datasets for rapid assessment of scour at coastal defence structures, facilitating model-informed decision-making.

1 Introduction

Scouring is the process of gradual erosion and removal of bed materials in the vicinity of coastal structures caused by hydrodynamic forces from waves and tidal currents. In addition to the hydrodynamic forces from tides and waves, which can be compounded by climate change influences, critical infrastructures including underwater pipelines, coastal defence structures, and coastal zone management processes such as dredging can contribute to conditions that are favourable to increased seabed scouring through the disruption of natural sediment transport processes and the alteration of the prevailing hydrodynamic environment in the nearshore region. Scouring at the toes of critical coastal defence structures (e.g., sloping and vertical seawalls) can result in the loss of structural integrity ( Salauddin and Pearson, 2019a ; Salauddin and Pearson, 2019b ; Tseng et al., 2022 ) and ultimate failure, and is particularly critical in the management of coastal flood risks. Toe scouring can elevate wave overtopping discharge at defences, by increasing water depth at the defence and causing the formation of larger waves at the structure ( Peng et al., 2023 ). The sedimentation and scouring in the vicinity of coastal structures can alter the bottom topography and bed slope, which in turn can influence wave shoaling and breaking processes and alters the turbulent kinetic energy budget of waves and their potential to overtop defences ( Peng et al., 2023 ). Given that extreme events in coastal regions are predicted to increase in intensity and frequency under climate change scenarios, increased exposure to toe scouring at coastal defences is likely to be an increasing issue in the coming years ( Fitri et al., 2019 ; Salauddin and O’Sullivan, 2022 ). The availability of accurate methods to predict toe scour depths is, therefore, critical for mitigating scour related risks.

Reliable prediction of scour depths at coastal defences challenging and is influenced by complex wave-structure interactions and a range of nearshore processes (hydrodynamic and morphological). The prediction of scour depth, therefore, involves the consideration of parameters that reflect the diverse processes. These relate to wave and current conditions, tide and wave approach angles, sediment and bathymetric characteristics and features, and water depth at the structure ( Müller et al., 2008 ; Pourzangbar et al., 2017a ). For example, the scouring patterns observed in fine and coarse grained bed material are distinctly different ( Pourzangbar et al., 2017b ). Previous studies also highlighted that scour depth from regular waves are generally larger than those observed for irregular waves.

A significant number of beaches globally are coarse-gained shingle beaches, often with man-made coastal defences such as vertical seawalls or sloping structures ( Powell and Lowe 1994 ; Salauddin and Pearson, 2018 ; Salauddin and Pearson, 2020 ). Although the literature (e.g., Pourzangbar et al., 2017a ; Pourzangbar et al., 2017b ) has demonstrated the robust performance of ML algorithms in predicting scour depth at sandy beaches, the capabilities of ML techniques for predicting scour in shingle foreshores are much less reported. The recent study by Salauddin et al. (2023) focussed on evaluating the effectiveness of ML algorithms for predicting scour depths at vertical seawalls and showed that ML models were able to predict scour depths with good accuracy for experimental data. Nevertheless, there remains a scope of the application of such algorithms to other structure types such as a sloping structure on a permeable shingle bed and investigate the performance of such algorithms in predicting scour depths for the same.

Here we present for the first time the development and testing of ML algorithms (namely, Support Vector Machines Regression (SVMR), Gradient Boosted Decision Trees (GBDT), Random Forests (RF) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN)) at a sloping structure with a sloping shingle foreshore. The models were trained and tested on a physical modelling experimental dataset of scour depths at a 1 in 2 (1 V:2H) impermeable sloping seawall located on a permeable 1 in 20 (1 V:20H) shingle foreshore. Advanced novel pre-processing and post-processing techniques such as feature selection and feature importance are proposed to facilitate ML-based modelling for scouring datasets and we devise a stepwise methodological framework for scouring prediction. The predictive performance of ML models are investigated through well-established statistical metrics. The key objectives of this study are (i) to develop a robust methodological framework to use data driven ML algorithms for predicting scour depth at coastal defences, and (ii) quantify the predictive performance of selected ML-based models for estimating scour depths at sloping coastal sea defences.

2 Scour prediction methods

Existing studies assessing scour at sea defences such as vertical seawalls and sloping seawalls are typically underpinned by numerical, laboratory and field-based modelling approaches to derive empirical relations and engineering guidance. Fowler (1992) developed empirical formulae for toe scour depth based on physical modelling of scouring at a vertical seawall placed on a sandy foreshore. Wallis et al. (2010) and Sutherland et al. (2003 , 2006) proposed an improved guidance for predicting scour depths at vertical walls constructed on sandy foreshores using field and laboratory observations. These authors also claimed that for the tested conditions, maximum scour depths at a plain vertical wall were similar to those observed for a 1 in 2 sloping seawall. In recent years, Salauddin and Pearson (2019a) , Salauddin and Pearson, (2019b) conducted a comprehensive suite of laboratory-based physical modelling experiments to characterise scouring at both vertical and sloping structures on shingle foreshores, subjected to a wide range of irregular wave conditions (including storm and swell sea states).

The review of literature relating to scour at seawalls reveals a substantial correlation between toe scour depth and relative water depth at the toe ( h t /L 0m ), where, h t is the toe water depth (m) and L 0m is the mean deep water wavelength (m), for defences on sandy foreshores. Sutherland et al. (2008) proposed an empirical relationship (Eq. 1 ) between the dimensionless scour depth ( S t /H s ), [calculated from scour depth S t (m) and significant wave height (m), H s (m)], and relative toe water depth ( h t /L 0m ) for the prediction of toe scour depth at a plain vertical seawall in a sandy beach. This was later verified by Müller et al. (2008) . Similar findings were also observed for scouring at a plain vertical wall with a shingle foreshore slope ( Salauddin and Pearson, 2019a ; Salauddin and Pearson, 2019b ). Sutherland et al. (2008) also proposed an empirically based equation to predict the toe scour depth for vertical seawalls considering the influence of beach slope (Eq. 2 ).

where, S t and S t m a x are the toe scour depth and maximum toe scour depth, respectively, H s is significant wave height (=highest one-third of wave heights), α is beach slope, h t is toe water depth, L 0 m is deep-water wavelength based on T m , where T m is the mean wave period.

Numerical modelling tools have also developed and applied to simulate scour behaviour at coastal defences ( Peng et al., 2018 ; Peng et al., 2023 ; Yeganeh-Bakhtiary et al., 2020 ). For example, Peng et al. (2023) utilized Reynolds Averaged Navier–Stokes equations (RANS) and the Volume of Fluid (VOF) modelling technique, coupled with wave-sediment transport and morphological factors, to simulate scour dynamics in front of an impermeable plane vertical seawall under specific wave conditions. However, robust numerical modelling techniques for estimating scour in wave environments still remain limited, largely as a result of the complexity of multiphase flow simulations, but also as a result of the high computational requirements (due to the involvement of intrinsic equations) that are involved. For example, in numerical simulations of estimating scour depths, uncertainty is induced from the dependency of such models on empirical parameters of the scouring process ( Yang et al., 2018 ).

In recent years, with advancements in data science and computational resources, Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the form of Machine Learning (ML) has been successfully employed to address a wide range of coastal engineering problems. For example, significant research relating to the development of AI based decision-support algorithms for the prediction of wave characteristics ( Yeganeh-Bakhtiary et al., 2023 ) and wave overtopping at coastal defences has been undertaken (see, for example, den Bieman et al., 2021a , 2021b; den Bieman et al., 2020 ; Elbisy, 2023 ; Elbisy and Elbisy, 2021 ; Habib et al., 2022b ; Habib et al., 2023a ; Habib et al., 2023b ). Habib et al. (2022a) has provided an overview of recent studies on the applications of ML approaches in coastal engineering problems.

Data-driven ML modelling approaches have been applied to predict scour depths at vertical breakwaters. Pourzangbar et al. (2017a) , Pourzangbar et al. (2017b) successfully applied several ML algorithms, including Genetic Programming (GP), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Support Vector Machine Regression (SVMR) and the M5’ Decision Tree model to predict scour depth from physical modelling data for impermeable vertical breakwaters with sandy foreshores. However, the development to date of ML-based scour prediction models have thus far been applied to vertical breakwaters and sandy foreshores with fine grains. Previous studies however have not dealt with the prediction of scour depth at a sloping structure on a permeable shingle foreshore using advanced ML algorithms, which has been addressed for the first time in this work.

3 Materials and methods

3.1 scouring dataset.

The scour dataset used in this study was obtained from experimental studies conducted in a 2D wave flume, 22 m long, 0.6 m wide, and 1 m deep ( Figure 1 ), at the University of Warwick’s Water Engineering Laboratory ( Salauddin and Pearson, 2019b ). The flume was equipped with a piston-type wave paddle, six Wave Gauges (WG) and active adsorption system capable of generating monochromatic and random waves, generating realistic sea states in the wave channel. The dataset consisted of over 120 experiments in which the scour characteristics at the toe of a sloping wall (1:2) with a shingle foreshore, of approximately 6 m length, on a 1:20 slope were observed and included a comprehensive range of incident wave conditions including both impulsive and non-impulsive waves. The JONSWAP wave spectrum with a peak-enhancement factor of 3.3 was applied to generate incident waves that were representative of the young sea state. The relative crest freeboard ( R c /H m0 ), (where Rc is the crest-freeboard of the defence structure and H mo is the wave height at the toe of the structure) ranged from 0.5 to 5.0 and this was achieved by applying six different types of toe water depths. The scouring characteristics were measured for both impulsive and non-impulsive wave conditions. The dataset comprising of 120 sets of observations, was split into a train-test set of 70%–30%.

www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 1 . Schematic of the Experimental setup for measuring scour depth at a sloping wall with a shingle foreshore (Adopted from Salauddin and Pearson, 2019b ).

For each test configuration, the scour depth was measured at the toe of the structure and at different locations along the wave flume in front of the structure. The maximum scour depth was then determined from these measurements. Analysis of the experimental data showed that, for the wave conditions tested, the maximum scour depth occurred at the toe of the structure. An insight into the database in terms of statistical correlation (Pearson R) revealed very low correlative relations between the scour parameters (described in the Glossary section) and the relative scour depth (= S t /H m0 ; where, S t is the measured scour depth and H m0 is the water depth at the toe of the structure). No negative correlation was observed between the variables, however, only R c /H 1/3,deep and I r showed a maximum correlation of 0.25 with the relative scour depth. Two kernel (ANN and SVMR) and two DT-based (RF and GBDT) algorithms were investigated in the study of Habib et al. (2023a) and it was reported that the algorithms performed satisfactorily in predicting wave overtopping at a vertical sea wall. The algorithms are hence also investigated for a scour dataset, since the intrinsic nature of the scour dataset is similar to what was applied in the overtopping study ( Habib et al., 2023b ).

The workflow followed in the data preparation, together with model development and testing is summarised in Figure 2 .

www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 2 . The methodological approach adopted for the ML based modelling.

SVMR is a category of supervised ML algorithms and an extension of the classification-based Support Vector Machines (SVM), typically employed for regression tasks ( Noori et al., 2022 ). SVMR algorithms aim to minimize the prediction error and simultaneously maximize the margin around the fitting function, effectively identifying the best-fit function for a given dataset. Figure 3 illustrates a typical workflow structure for SVMR. For a regression problem using a training dataset containing interlinked input features ( x i ) and target values ( y i ), SVMR deduces a function f ( x ) that predicts the target values y based on input features x . The fundamental goal of SVMR is to construct a hyperplane that closely fits the training data within a specified tolerance of error margin ( ε ). Feature points inside the epsilon tube surrounding the hyperplane are regarded as support vectors, w, and do not incur any penalties. Points outside of this tube are penalized because they add to the error. The loss function is determined using Eq. 3 :

where, ε i and ε 1 * are slack variables that gauge how far the outliers are from the ε -tube, N is the total number of slack variables and C is a regularization factor that can be adjusted to determine the flatness of the hyperplane.

www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 3 . The workflow of a SVMR algorithm adopted in this study.

The main goal of the optimisation approaches related to SVMR is deducing the optimal values for w , and the slack variables, ε i and ε 1 * SVMR. The objective is to minimize the regularization term while ensuring that errors are within ε and slack variables remain non-negative. If non-linearity exists, the feature data is projected onto kernel space, a higher-dimensional hyperplane, which improves the model’s accuracy. The function k x i , x j defines the kernel space, and in this study, a Gaussian Radial Basis kernel function (RBF, Eq. 4 ) is utilised:

where, σ is the kernel parameter. Gaussian RBF kernel is suitable for datasets with unknown or challenging-to-trace intrinsic feature characteristics ( Roushangar and Koosheh, 2015 ). This is because the RBF kernel, based on the Taylor Series expansion, can accommodate an infinite number of feature dimensions. SVMR is particularly known for producing robust predictions when dealing with non-linear and high dimensional data (e.g., Kawashima and Kumano, 2017 ; Lan et al., 2023 ), similar to the dataset used in this study.

ANNs are well established in coastal engineering applications for tackling classification and regression tasks by mapping inputs to outputs, assigning weights to specific inputs, estimating and minimizing a loss function (example.g., Raikar et al., 2018 ; Verhaeghe et al., 2008 ; Zanuttigh et al., 2016 ; Formentin et al., 2017 ; EurOtop, 2018 ; Habib et al., 2023a ; Habib et al., 2023b ). Figure 4 illustrates the workflow of a feed-forward and back propagation ANN algorithm, including the input, hidden, and output layers. The input layer receives data from the training set. The information is only communicated to and from each layer within the neural network and not between neurones in the same layer. The model’s hidden layers are responsible for assigning numerical weights to the incoming information from the input layers and to the activation functions. The output layer of the network estimates the quantity predicted by the activation functions and then calculates the dependent feature(s) from the independent feature(s) in the input layers ( Babaee et al., 2021 ; Khosravi et al., 2023 ).

www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 4 . Schematic of a feed-forward and back propagation ANN algorithm adopted in this study.

A Multi-Layered Perceptron (MLP) ANN, which is feed-forward and back-propagation in nature, is adopted in this study ( Figure 4 ). The term feed-forward and back-propagation essentially means that until a predetermined allowable error rate is achieved, the error rates are minimized by altering the loss functions through a combination of feed-forward (exchange of information from Input to Hidden to Output Layers) and back propagation (exchange of information from Output to Hidden and Hidden to Input Layers). The adjustment of weights and biases during the backpropagation stage is determined by the error rate. This process involves assigning new weights and activation functions to the hidden layers. The optimization of the number of hidden layers is usually based on the complexity of the input data, aiming to minimize prediction error ( Elbeltagi et al., 2021 ; 2022 ).

3.4 RF and GBDT

RF and GBDT algorithms are typically categorised as Decision Trees (DTs). DTs are supervised machine learning algorithms used to predict an output variable (i.e., dependent or target variable) based on a set of independent variables (i.e., features). DTs are capable of tackling both classification and regression problems. In regression, they predict continuous or numerical output variables, while in classification, they predict class labels for discrete output variables ( Yeganeh-Bakhtiary et al., 2022 ).

In the case of regression-based DTs, the training data is iteratively partitioned into rectangular regions, and the mean and median values within each region is estimated until a pre-determined stopping criteria are met. For example, given a training dataset, X = x 1 , y 1 , x 2 , y 2 . . . . , x n , y n , where x i represents an input feature vector for the i th training dataset and y i is the corresponding output, the DT algorithm divides X into a series of rectangular regions, denoted as R1, R2, R3, etc. For each region, the median and mean are estimated to serve as the prediction value P for that corresponding region. The final DT is constructed using the input features that distinctly divide these rectangular sections and yield the output variable with the smallest variance. DTs are commonly used in prediction tasks due to their ability to handle noise and non-linearity in input data independently ( Pedregosa et al., 2011 ; Kotu and Deshpande, 2015 ; Yeganeh-Bakhtiary et al., 2023 ).

A Random Forest (RF) algorithm is an ensemble of DTs constructed from a random sub-set of training data. Figure 5 illustrates a schematic of methodological workflow for RF modelling approach.

www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 5 . The workflow of a RF algorithm [Adopted from Habib et al. (2023a) ].

RF model aims to reduce overfitting and enhance generalization by minimizing overexposure to any specific set of training data. The final prediction from tRF is the average of predictions made by individual DTs, often referred to as bagging. An additional advantage of RF is its capability handle both categorical and numerical data, further minimising overfitting.

The boosting strategy is another method for enhancing DTs’ predictive capabilities. An example of a Boosting approach is the GBDT algorithm (see Figure 6 ). The Mean Squared Error (MSE) between the predicted and actual values is measured in the boosting technique using a loss function. During training, the boosting algorithm aims to minimize this loss function by assigning numerical coefficients to input data, often through gradient descent. The GBDT algorithm, in particular, is known for rapidly minimizing the loss function, resulting in faster and more accurate predictions from DT models ( Sutton, 2005 ).

www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 6 . The workflow of a GBDT algorithm. Adopted from Habib et al. (2023b) .

3.5 Model optimization

3.5.1 hyperparameter tuning.

Hyperparameters refer to the parameters of a ML algorithm that can be adjusted or tuned by the user, as opposed to model parameters, such as the coefficients of mapping functions, which are not user-accessible. Hyperparameter tuning is a crucial process for reducing overfitting and ensuring that the ML algorithm is well-suited for a specific set of input data. Hyperparameter tuning was conducted for all the ML adopted models in this study using the open-source scikit-learn library in Python ( Pedregosa et al., 2011 ). Table 1 summarises the optimum hyperparameters adopted for the SVMR, RF, GBDT, and ANN models. The SVMR algorithm’s regularization parameter is represented by the C term in Table 1 . The algorithm’s “engine” is a function called the kernel that maps input parameters (independent variables) onto output values (dependent variable). This study investigates the performance of linear, polynomial and RBF kernels. Gamma ( Table 1 ) is a kernel function coefficient. This study combines “RandomizedSearch” and a k-fold Cross Validation (CV) to find the best parameters. CV is a popular resampling method that eliminates bias from prediction models ( Pedregosa et al., 2011 ; Salauddin et al., 2023 ). The data is randomly divided into k sets of nearly similar size for k-fold cross validation. The ML algorithms are first tested on these folds to validate the training, and then applied to the test set. The validation step ensures that the algorithms explicitly capture the variations and patterns in the training set. The function RandomizedSearchCV (RS) uses a set number of random combinations of hyperparameters. The RS function is particularly suitable for performing hypertuning when there are a large number of hyperparameters involved, i.e., similar to this work.

www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 1 . Set of hyperparameters and their optimised values.

The key functional components of a DT network can be found in the hyperparameters of the RF model ( Table 1 ). “n_estimators” determines the number of trees in an RF, while “max_depth” and “min_samples_split” help mitigating overfitting. In this study, a random search with Cross Validation (CV) was used for hyperparameter tuning in the RF model.

GBDT and RF are both based on DTs, with GBDT relying on gradient boosting. GBDT’s hyperparameters ( Table 1 ) determine the size of the decision tree that best suits the input data. “learning_rate” is crucial for reducing overfitting as it computes the weights of input features to converge the error in the loss function. “max_depth” also plays a role in reducing overfitting by limiting the number of nodes in the trees. For GBDT, hyperparameter tuning was performed using a random search with 5-fold cross validation. The scope of hyperparameter tuning with ANN is limited ( Huang et al., 2012 ; Ghiasi et al., 2022 ). RS with a k-fold CV approach is implemented in this study to enhance the learning rate “alpha,” and the best model is determined based on the model loss criterion. Typical hyperparameter tuning values for the ANN models are adopted from LeCun et al. (2015) and Glorot and Bengio (2010) . The kernel function of the ANN is located in the hidden layers, and the user can predetermine both the number of layers and neurons in each layer. Additional to the ‘alpha’ parameter’ and the activation function, the number of epochs was adjusted to attain the optimal set of hyperparameters for the ANN in this study.

3.5.2 Feature selection and feature transformation

Robust ML-based predictions can be challenging when dealing with high-dimensional data that can reduce the effectiveness and accuracy of machine learning algorithms due to data redundancy. Additionally, computational resource costs can increase due to prolonged algorithm runtimes. To address the issue of data redundancy, feature selection techniques are employed. These techniques aim to filter a subset of relevant features from a large dataset, effectively eliminating redundancy and irrelevance ( Cai et al., 2018 ). Feature selection is typically achieved through statistics-based permutation combinations, which measure the correlation of individual features with a target feature. The most important features are then deduced based on their correlation scores, as highlighted by Liu and Motoda (2012) and Donnelly et al. (2024) .

Feature transformation is a technique used for extracting useful features from a large dataset, where the initial number of features is transformed into a new, more compact dataset with fewer but relevant features, while conserving the implicit and/or explicit information of the original dataset. One well-known feature transformation technique is Principal Component Analysis (PCA) ( Roessner et al., 2011 ; Noori et al., 2022 ). PCA is particularly useful for capturing and reducing variance in large datasets by selecting the most relevant features that account for the majority of variance across the dataset. It is characterized as a dimensionality reduction technique that converts the original variables into uncorrelated principal components.

This study adopts a combination of feature selection and feature transformation techniques to discover and filter the most relevant features in the scour dataset. A Forward Sequential Feature Selection (FSFS) method is employed for feature selection. FSFS is a “greedy” method that iteratively builds a set of selected features ( S ) by adding new features, one at a time, and performing prediction tasks using a chosen estimator. In more concrete terms, FSFS starts with zero features and identifies the feature that, when used to train an estimator (e.g., linear regression in this study), maximizes a Cross Validation (CV) score. This process is repeated, adding one feature at a time, until all features in the dataset have been considered. The number of features that maximizes the CV score is considered the optimal number. FSFS is widely accepted for its simplicity and accuracy in estimating the number of important features in a dataset ( Marcano-Cedeno et al., 2010 ). In this study, FSFS determined 10 parameters as the optimum number of features (see Figure 7 ). Subsequently, PCA was applied to gain insight into the 10 most important features of the dataset utilised in this study, including d 50 (mm), Duration (s), h t (m), R c (m), T m,deep (s), L p (m), L m (m), R c /H 1/3,deep , h t /H 1/3,deep and I r (terms are explained in the glossary). The data corresponding to the features proposed by FSFS are selected as predictive model input for the training and testing phase of the ML algorithms.

www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 7 . Variation of performance metric (CV score) with the number of features during Forward Sequential Feature Selection (FSFS).

Further analysis of the training phase was conducted by examining the variation of RMSE in the training set ( Figure 8 ). The CV value and the number of training and validation iterations were set at 5 and 100, respectively. Figure 8 illustrates that, despite observing RMSE variations across all the algorithms, the average RMSE remained consistent in all the cases. This indicates that the selected algorithms in this study are capable of producing similar performance on the given dataset.

www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 8 . Variation of RMSE during the training phase for SVMR, ANN, RF and GBDT algorithms.

3.6 Evaluation metrics

To evaluate the performance of the machine learning algorithms in predicting relative scour depth, the predicted values were compared to the observed values using statistical metrics including the coefficient of determination ( R 2 ), root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and relative absolute error (RAE). The Coefficient of Determination (Eq. 5 ) describes the percentage of the dependent variable’s fluctuation that can be predicted from the independent variables and, as such, serves as a gauge to evaluate the overall effectiveness of ML models ( Cheng et al., 2014 ):

where y i , y ^ i   a n d   y ¯ are the observed values, predicted values, and mean of all observed values, respectively.

The standard deviations between the observed and predicted values are reflected in the Root Mean Square Error ( RMSE ) calculated from Eq. 6 , and discrepancies between these values, averaged across the number of observations, is expressed in terms of the Mean Absolute Error (MAE) as in Eq. 7 :

where, q A and q P are the actual and predicted relative scour depths, respectively.

In a regression test, the null hypothesis is that all of the regression coefficients are zero, i.e., the model is not predictive. The F-test is performed to determine whether accept or reject the null hypothesis. The F-test assesses whether the addition of predictor or dependent variables improves the model compared to a model with only an intercept (zero predictor variables). It quantifies the ratio of explained variance to unexplained variance (residuals) as (Eq. 8 ):

where, S S R = ∑ y i − y ^ i 2 , S S E = ∑ y i − y ¯ 2 , k and n are the numbers of independent variables and observations, respectively.

The plot of the residuals or the Discrepancy Ratio (DR) against the predicted values is also an important criteria about the relevancy of a prediction model and the residuals should ideally exhibit zero correlation with the predicted values ( Sahay and Dutta, 2009 ; Salauddin et al., 2023 ).

The study of Kissell and Poserina, (2017) suggested that the statistical significance of regression models (where predicted values are compared against observed ones) should be holistically evaluated in terms of the r 2 score, F-test score and the p -value. The values obtained from these statistical parameters should be in agreement to deduce the stability and accuracy of regression models.

4 Results and discussion

4.1 model performances.

The experimental dataset of Salauddin and Pearson (2019a) was deployed for training and testing of all the ML algorithms examined in this study following scalar transformations and feature selection. Training and testing of the models followed a common methodology which provided the basis for comparing modelled and measured dimensionless scour depths (S t /H 1/3 deep [-]) in Figure 9 . Results indicate that all the four ML-based models tested in this study are capable of providing realistic approximation of scour depths. In-depth statistical evaluation of the predictive models is presented in Table 2 .

www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 9 . Comparison of predicted versus actual relative scour depths (=S t /H 1/3 deep [-]) for (A) SVMR , (B) ANN, (C) RF, and (D) GBDT.

www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 2 . Prediction evaluation metrics and statistical scores for ML-based models.

Notably, a number of data points for smaller (near to 0.0) relative scour depths fall outside the 95% CIs. This pattern is also evident for a few datapoints of large relative scour depth, while a few data points representing larger relative scour depths were inside the 95% CI zone. This suggests that while the algorithms were capable of robust overall predictions, but in the case of both smaller and larger relative scour depths, they exhibited some inconsistency. However, predictions for larger relative scour depths were more accurate (positioning on or very close to the regression line in Figure 9 ). The scatter in the graphs can be explained by the Pearson R score. Among the tested algorithms, ANN, GBDT, and RF showed similar scatter with relatively lower R scores compared to SVMR. SVMR, in particular, demonstrated comparatively more accurate predictions, as reflected by the highest r 2 and R scores of 0.74 and 0.85, respectively. The RMSE values of the algorithms did not vary by a large margin with respect to one another. The SVMR yielded the lowest RMSE value of 0.28 while that of the RF was the highest at 0.33. The highest RMSE value was approximately 22% of the predicted maximum relative scour depth. From a computational efficiency perspective, under the given hyperparameter conditions ( Table 1 ) and using a computer with an 8 cores CPU, 16 GB RAM, and 6 GB of dedicated GPU memory, the SVMR, ANN, GBDT and RF algorithms completed the prediction task (for the test set) in 2.5, 6.93, 14.83 and 22.3 s, respectively. This information suggests that SVMR outperforms the other algorithms in terms of computational efficiency.

Comprehensive statistical analyses of the developed ML-based models’ performance were conducted in this study. Statistical scores are then used to rank the performance of the four tested ML algorithms in predicting scour depth at sloping structures with shingle foreshore. Table 2 shows the results of performance evaluation of the algorithms according to the criteria outlined in Section 4.1 .

The results from the evaluation metrics indicate that all the algorithms yielded strong r 2 scores ( r 2 scores >0.40; Kissell and Poserina, 2017 ). Hence, the F-test was performed and it was observed that all the models yielded F-score higher than the critical F-test score of 4.15 ( Table 2 ) and also the p-values for all the models were substantially (∼10 −6 ) lower than the significance level of 0.05. These findings reflect the statistical significance of the results obtained from the ML algorithms and it can be inferred that the variations in the independent variable (actual relative scour depth) were accounted for by the dependent variable (predicted relative scour depth). The cumulative number of outliers in the models is expressed in the form of the RMSE. The SVMR algorithm yielded the predicted relative scour depth quantity with the smallest number of outliers, reflected in the lowest RMSE of 0.28 across all the tested algorithms. The RMSE of the other algorithms is not shown to differ significantly, suggesting the appropriateness and robustness of the proposed ML algorithms for predicting relative scour depth. A higher RMSE and MAE was coupled with lower r 2 and vice versa for all the models. It is noted that the scale of MAE is dependent on the scale of the outputs (here, the predicted relative scour depth). The maximum and minimum absolute relative scour depth in the test set was 1.5 and 0.8, respectively, giving a mean relative scour depth of 1.15. The maximum MAE of 0.22 across the models was observed for the RF model. Conversely, the minimum MAE of 0.17 was determined for the SVMR model. Therefore, the range of MAE evaluated for this study was between 14.7% and 19% for the mean relative scour depth in the test set, consisted of 32 observations derived from the original set of 120 observations using a train-test split of 70%–30%. The significance of the MAE analysis is that the models were able to predict the relative scour depth with an approximate accuracy of 80%. Overall, the most accurate scour predictions were attributed to the SVMR model, with the least accurate predictions being associated with the RF and GBDT models, suggesting that DT based algorithms may be less suited for obtaining predictions from smaller datasets.

4.2 Feature importance

The method of evaluating the relative contribution of various features, also referred to as variables or predictors, in a predictive model is known as Feature Importance (FI). It is useful for selecting features, comprehending the underlying data, and getting new perspectives on the subject at hand. FI reveals which features have the most impact on the model’s predictions, essentially bridging the findings from ML to the physical consistency of the underlying processes (i.e., scouring in this study). The FI results are reported in two formats here, namely, the magnitude of the coefficients method and the permutation importance method. This is due to the fact that although the DT-based algorithms (i.e., RF and GBDT) had in-built FI analysis functions, the other two algorithms (SVMR and ANN) did not possess this function in Scikit-Learn’s module. In the magnitude of the coefficients method, the size of the coefficients directly reflects the significance of the feature. Greater absolute values imply greater significance of the predictors. The permutation importance method involves permuting a predictor’s values at random and analyzing the impact on model performance. The more performance is lost, the more significant the feature is thought to be. The results are reported in a similar format to that of the magnitude of coefficients method. Figure 10 summarizes the impact of the predictors on the prediction analysis.

www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 10 . Feature Importance Analysis showing the impact of predictors.

In some experiments related to the measurement of relative scour depth at sloping walls with gravel foreshore, it was reported that the Iribarren Number I r had a strong positive correlation with the measured scour depths for a given relative toe water depth ( h t /L 0m ) ( Salauddin and Pearson, 2019b ). Hence, it was expected that I r would have the maximum influence in the prediction analysis to ensure consistency with experimental results. The FI analysis results show that 3 out of 4 (i.e., ANN, SVMR, and RF) algorithms identified I r as the most important predictor. For the GBDT algorithm, I r is ranked as one of the top three predictors, while the water depth at the toe of the structure ( h t ) is identified as the most important predictor. In Figure 10 , the bars labelled as ‘others’, comprises the summation of the magnitude of importance of features including d 50 , Duration, R c , T m deep , and L m from the four tested algorithms. Therefore, it can be inferred from the results of FI, that the physical scouring processes are reasonably well-captured in the proposed ML-based models.

4.3 Residuals

The residual plot for all of the tested algorithms is shown in Figure 11 . The residuals are independent of the predicted values, highlighting that the results are in good agreement regarding the reliability of the models.

www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 11 . Variation of Residuals with predicted relative scour depth.

4.4 Taylor’s diagram

An effective visual method to describe the statistical metrics from predictive models is the Taylor’s Diagram ( Taylor, 2001 ). The Taylor’s Diagram ( Figure 12 ) shows three statistical parameters, including the correlation coefficient projected as an azimuthal angle (in black), the radially plotted Centered Root Mean Square (cRMS) (in green), and the horizontally plotted standard deviations (in blue). Taylor diagram is particularly robust for assessing and comparing several performance aspectsof complicated models.

www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 12 . Taylor’s Diagram of the statistical metrics determined for all tested ML-based models.

Due to the fact that they are both the square roots of squared differences between the actual and predicted values, standard deviation and the cRMS are comparable. However, they differ from one another in the context that RMSE is used to gauge the gap between actual values and the corresponding predictions while standard deviation accounts for the spread of data around the mean. The error of prediction, or the quantitative deviation is measured using the cRMS. Here, the cRMS of the SVMR is the lowest, while the standard deviation is the highest. This essentially means that while the predicted results are more spread across the regression line, the quantity of spread is small, indicated by the low cRMS score. Conversely, RF and ANN has lower standard deviation, but the quantity of deviation is high which is reflected by the higher cRMS score. The SVMR model also yielded the highest correlation coefficient of 0.96 followed by that of ANN (0.955), RF (0.95) and GBDT (0.92). Therefore, from a holistic point of view it could be inferred from the Taylor’s Diagram that the SVMR produced the more accurate values of predicted relative scour depth.

5 Conclusion

Climate change-induced extreme climatic events intensify scouring in front of coastal infrastructures, posing a significant threat to their structural integrity and reliability. The development of robust prediction tools for coastal scouring is crucial for enhancing coastal resilience and safeguard these vital defences. This study examined the capabilities of advanced ML techniques for prediction of relative scour depths at sloping seawalls with shingle foreshores. This study developed a methodological framework for implementing of ML-based models for accurate predictions of relative scour depths at sloping walls with shingle foreshore. Four ML algorithms including RF, GBDT, SVMR, and ANN were utilised and tested on an experimental dataset of scour depths. We proposed a robust and efficient framework including detailed procedures for data scaling, feature selection, and tuning of the modelling parameters.

A methodological approach is proposed for pre-processing the physical modelling dataset to conduct missing value imputations, feature transformation (PCA), selection, and data scaling to ensure redundant data and missing values do not impair the performance of the ML models. In order to verify the ML algorithms on a randomly selected sub-set of training data, cross validation was carried out in the training step. A typical train-test split of 70%–30% was implemented. These precautions ensured that a consistent methodology was followed to achieve comparable outcomes from the predictions made by the four algorithms. Iribarren Number (Ir) was identified as the most important parameter influencing the scouring process, in agreement with the physical process of scouring.

The performance of the proposed ML-based predictive models were evaluated for a comprehensive experimental dataset. The predicted relative scour depth and comprehensive statistical evaluation confirmed the robust performance and accuracy of all the tested algorithms.

A set of statistical indices, ( r 2 , RMSE, MAE, F-test and Pearson R ) were incorporated to gauge the efficiency of the tested ML algorithms. The SVMR algorithm showed superior performance compared to the other tested algorithms with an r 2 score of 0.74, RMSE of 0.28, MAE of 0.17 and Pearson R value of 0.96. The DT based algorithms were not able to match performance of SVMR and ANN with scores of 0.62 for r 2 for both RF and GBDT. ANN was identified as the second-best performing algorithm with a r 2 score closest to that of SVMR the (0.68). The F-test score and the Pearson R values of the algorithms are indicative of the fact that the variation of the independent variable is accounted for by the dependent variables or the predictors and that there is strong correlation between the actual and predicted values. These findings were reinforced by the high Pearson R values of 0.96, 0.955, 0.95 and 0.92 for SVMR, ANN, RF and GBDT, respectively. The SVMR model was also the most computationally efficient model (<3s), more than two times faster than ANN (6.93s) followed by DT based GBDT (14.83s) and RF (22.3s). The comparison of MAE revealed that accuracy of predictions was over 80% for all the algorithms. One important reason of DTs underperforming in this study may be due to the relatively small number of training data. Although there is no explicit requirement of the amount of training data required by ML algorithms, larger and more diverse datasets could improve the performance of ML-based models presented in this study. Future studies should focus on further improving the performance of the proposed predictive tool by the inclusion of larger experimental datasets. Hybrid machine learning approaches with optimisation techniques could potentially enhance predictive performance of the models proposed here and should be tested on wave-induced scouring datasets. The method proposed in this study could be adopted by coastal engineers for rapid scour depth prediction and inform design and maintenance of coastal defence structures.

Data availability statement

The data analyzed in this study is subject to the following licenses/restrictions: Data will be made available on reasonable request. Requests to access these datasets should be directed to [email protected] .

Author contributions

MAH: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing–original draft. SA: Writing–review and editing. JO’S: Writing–review and editing, Supervision. MS: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing–review and editing.

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Babaee, M., Maroufpoor, S., Jalali, M., Zarei, M., and Elbeltagi, A. (2021). Artificial intelligence approach to estimating rice yield. Irrigation Drainage 70 (4), 732–742. doi:10.1002/ird.2566

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cai, J., Luo, J., Wang, S., and Yang, S. (2018). Feature selection in machine learning: a new perspective. Neurocomputing 300, 70–79. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2017.11.077

Cheng, C.-L., Shalabh, , and Garg, G. (2014). Coefficient of determination for multiple measurement error models. J. Multivar. Analysis 126, 137–152. doi:10.1016/j.jmva.2014.01.006

den Bieman, J. P., van Gent, M. R. A., and van den Boogaard, H. F. P. (2021a). Wave overtopping predictions using an advanced machine learning technique. Coast. Eng. 166, 103830. doi:10.1016/j.coastaleng.2020.103830

den Bieman, J. P., Wilms, J. M., van den Boogaard, H. F. P., and van Gent, M. R. A. (2020). Prediction of mean wave overtopping discharge using gradient boosting decision trees. Water 12 (6), 1703. doi:10.3390/w12061703

Donnelly, J., Daneshkhah, A., and Abolfathi, S. (2024). Forecasting global climate drivers using Gaussian processes and convolutional autoencoders. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 128, 107536. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107536

Elbeltagi, A., Kumari, N., Dharpure, J., Mokhtar, A., Alsafadi, K., Kumar, M., et al. (2021). Prediction of combined terrestrial evapotranspiration index (CTEI) over large river basin based on machine learning approaches. Water 13 (4), 547. doi:10.3390/w13040547

Elbeltagi, A., Pande, C. B., Kouadri, S., and Islam, A. R. M. T. (2022). Applications of various data-driven models for the prediction of groundwater quality index in the Akot basin, Maharashtra, India. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 29 (12), 17591–17605. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-17064-7

Elbisy, M. S. (2023). Machine learning techniques for estimating wave-overtopping discharges at coastal structures. Ocean. Eng. 273, 113972. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.113972

Elbisy, M. S., and Elbisy, A. M. S. (2021). Prediction of significant wave height by artificial neural networks and multiple additive regression trees. Ocean. Eng. 230, 109077. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109077

EurOtop, (2018). Manual on Wave Overtopping of Sea Defences and Related Structures . 2nd Edn. Available online at: www.overtopping-manual.com (accessed July, 2023)

Fitri, A., Hashim, R., Abolfathi, S., and Abdul Maulud, K. N. (2019). Dynamics of sediment transport and erosion-deposition patterns in the locality of a detached low-crested breakwater on a cohesive coast. Water 11 (8), 1721. doi:10.3390/w11081721

Formentin, S. M., Zanuttigh, B., and van der Meer, J. W. (2017). A neural network tool for predicting wave reflection, overtopping and transmission. Coast. Eng. J. 59 (1), 1750006. doi:10.1142/S0578563417500061

Fowler, J. E. (1992). “Scour problems and methods for prediction of maximum scour at vertical seawalls,” in Us army corps of engineers (Vicksburg, MS, USA: Coastal Engineering Research Center ). W. E. S. (eds.), Technical Report CERC-92–16.

Google Scholar

Ghiasi, B., Noori, R., Sheikhian, H., Zeynolabedin, A., Sun, Y., Jun, C., et al. (2022). Uncertainty quantification of granular computing-neural network model for prediction of pollutant longitudinal dispersion coefficient in aquatic streams. Sci. Rep. 12, 4610. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-08417-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Glorot, X., and Bengio, Y. (2010). “Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks,” in International conference on artificial intelligence and statistics. 2010 .

Habib, M. A., Abolfathi, S., O'Sullivan, J. J., and Salauddin, M. (2023b). “Prediction of wave overtopping rates at sloping structures using artificial intelligence,” in Proceedings of the 40th IAHR World Congress. Rivers–Connecting Mountains and Coasts , 404–413. doi:10.3850/978-90-833476-1-5_iahr40wc-p0115-cd

Habib, M. A., O'Sullivan, J., and Salauddin, M. (2022a). Comparison of machine learning algorithms in predicting wave overtopping discharges at vertical breakwaters . Austria: EGU General Assembly Vienna , EGU22–329. 23–27 May 2022. doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu22-329

Habib, M. A., O’Sullivan, J. J., Abolfathi, S., and Salauddin, M. (2023a). Enhanced wave overtopping simulation at vertical breakwaters using machine learning algorithms. PLOS ONE 18 (8), e0289318. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0289318

Habib, M. A., O’Sullivan, J. J., and Salauddin, M. (2022b). Prediction of wave overtopping characteristics at coastal flood defences using machine learning algorithms: a systematic rreview. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 1072 (1), 012003. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1072/1/012003

Huang, G. B., Zhou, H., Ding, X., and Zhang, R. (2012). Extreme learning machine for regression and multiclass classification. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cyber Part B 42, 513–529. doi:10.1109/tsmcb.2011.2168604

Kawashima, I., and Kumano, H. (2017). Prediction of mind-wandering with electroencephalogram and non-linear regression modeling. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 11, 365. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2017.00365

Khosravi, K., Rezaie, F., Cooper, J. R., Kalantari, Z., Abolfathi, S., and Hatamiafkoueieh, J. (2023). Soil water erosion susceptibility assessment using deep learning algorithms. J. Hydrology 618, 129229. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129229

Kissell, R., and Poserina, J. (2017). “Regression models,” in Optimal sports math, statistics, and fantasy ( Elsevier ), 39–67. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-805163-4.00002-5

Kotu, V., and Deshpande, B. (2015). “Classification,” in Predictive analytics and data mining ( Elsevier ), 63–163. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-801460-8.00004-5

Lan, J., Zheng, M., Chu, X., and Ding, S. (2023). Parameter prediction of the non-linear nomoto model for different ship loading conditions using support vector regression. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 11 (5), 903. doi:10.3390/jmse11050903

LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., and Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature 521, 436–444. doi:10.1038/nature14539

Liu, H., and Motoda, H. (2012). Feature selection for knowledge discovery and data mining . Springer Science & Business Media .

Marcano-Cedeno, A., Quintanilla-Dominguez, J., Cortina-Januchs, M. G., and Andina, D. (2010). “Feature selection using sequential forward selection and classification applying artificial metaplasticity neural network,” in IECON 2010 - 36th Annual Conference on IEEE Industrial Electronics Society , 2845–2850. doi:10.1109/IECON.2010.5675075

Müller, G., Allsop, W., Bruce, T., Kortenhaus, A., Pearce, A., and Sutherland, J. (2008). “The occurrence and effects of wave impacts,” in Proceedings of the ICE-Maritime Engineering (ICE) , 167–173.

Noori, R., Ghiasi, B., Salehi, S., Esmaeili Bidhendi, M., Raeisi, A., Partani, S., et al. (2022). An efficient data driven-based model for prediction of the total sediment load in rivers. Hydrology 9 (2), 36. doi:10.3390/hydrology9020036

Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., et al. (2011). Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1201.0490

Peng, Z., Zou, Q. P., and Lin, P. (2018). A partial cell technique for modeling the morphological change and scour. Coast. Eng. 131, 88–105. doi:10.1016/j.coastaleng.2017.09.006

Peng, Z., Zou, Q. P., and Lin, P. (2023). “Impulsive wave overtopping with toe scour at a vertical seawall,” in ICE Breakwater Conference 2023 , UK .

Pourzangbar, A., Brocchini, M., Saber, A., Mahjoobi, J., Mirzaaghasi, M., and Barzegar, M. (2017b). Prediction of scour depth at breakwaters due to non-breaking waves using machine learning approaches. Appl. Ocean. Res. 63, 120–128. doi:10.1016/j.apor.2017.01.012

Pourzangbar, A., Losada, M. A., Saber, A., Ahari, L. R., Larroudé, P., Vaezi, M., et al. (2017a). Prediction of non-breaking wave induced scour depth at the trunk section of breakwaters using Genetic Programming and Artificial Neural Networks. Coast Eng. 121, 107–118. doi:10.1016/j.coastaleng.2016.12.008

Powell, K. A., and Lowe, J. P. (1994). The scouring of sediments at the toe of seawalls. In: Proceedings of the Hornafjordor International Coastal Symposium, Iceland , 749–755.

Raikar, R. V., Wang, C.-Y., Shih, H.-P., and Hong, J.-H. (2016). Prediction of contraction scour using ANN and GA. Flow Meas. Instrum. 50, 26–34. doi:10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2016.06.006

Roessner, U., Nahid, A., Chapman, B., Hunter, A., and Bellgard, M. (2011). “Metabolomics – the combination of analytical biochemistry, biology, and informatics,” in Comprehensive biotechnology ( Elsevier ), 435–447. doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-64046-8.00027-6

Roushangar, K., and Koosheh, A. (2015). Evaluation of GA-SVR method for modeling bed load transport in gravel-bed rivers. J. Hydrology 527, 1142–1152. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.06.006

Sahay, R. R., and Dutta, S. (2009). Prediction of longitudinal dispersion coefficients in natural rivers using genetic algorithm. Hydrology Res. 40 (6), 544–552. doi:10.2166/nh.2009.014

Salauddin, M., O’Sullivan, J., Abolfathi, S., Peng, Z., Dong, S., and Pearson, J. M. (2022). New insights in the probability distributions of wave-by-wave overtopping volumes at vertical breakwaters. Sci. Rep. 12, 16228. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-20464-5

Salauddin, M., and Pearson, J. (2018). A laboratory study on wave overtopping at vertical seawalls with a shingle foreshore. Coast. Eng. Proc. (36), 56. doi:10.9753/icce.v36.waves.56

Salauddin, M., and Pearson, J. M. (2019a). Wave overtopping and toe scouring at a plain vertical seawall with shingle foreshore: a Physical model study. Ocean. Eng. 171, 286–299. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.11.011

Salauddin, M., and Pearson, J. M. (2019b). Experimental study on toe scouring at sloping walls with gravel foreshores. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 7, 198. doi:10.3390/jmse7070198

Salauddin, M., Shaffrey, D., and Habib, M. A. (2023). Data-driven approaches in predicting scour depths at a vertical seawall on a permeable shingle foreshore. J. Coast Conserv. 27, 18. doi:10.1007/s11852-023-00948-w

Salauddin, M., and Pearson, J. M. (2020). Laboratory investigation of overtopping at a sloping structure with permeable shingle foreshore. Ocean Engineering 197. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106866

Sutherland, J., Brampton, A. H., Motyka, G., Blanco, B., and Whitehouse, R. J. W. (2003). Beach lowering in front of coastal structures-Research Scoping Study . London, UK . Report FD1916/TR.

Sutherland, J., Brampton, A. H., Obrai, C., Dunn, S., and Whitehouse, R. J. W. (2008). Understanding the lowering of beaches in front of coastal defence structures, Stage 2-Research Scoping Study . London, UK . Report FD1927/TR.

Sutherland, J., Obhrai, C., Whitehouse, R., and Pearce, A. (2006). “Laboratory tests of scour at a seawall,” in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Scour and Erosion, CURNET (Gouda, Netherlands: Technical University of Denmark ).

Sutton, C. D. (2005). Classification and regression trees, bagging, and boosting (pp. 303–329). doi:10.1016/S0169-7161(04)24011-1

Taylor, K. E. (2001). Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 106 (D7), 7183–7192. doi:10.1029/2000JD900719

Tseng, I.-F., Hsu, C.-H., Yeh, P.-H., and Lin, T.-C. (2022). Physical mechanism for seabed scouring around a breakwater—a case study in mailiao port. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 10 (10), 1386. doi:10.3390/jmse10101386

Verhaeghe, H., De Rouck, J., and van der Meer, J. (2008). Combined classifier–quantifier model: a 2-phases neural model for prediction of wave overtopping at coastal structures. Coast. Eng. 55 (5), 357–374. doi:10.1016/j.coastaleng.2007.12.002

Wallis, M., Whitehouse, R., and Lyness, N. (2010). Development of guidance for the management of the toe of coastal defence structures. In Coasts, marine structures and breakwaters: Adapting to change: Proceedings of the 9th international conference organised by the Institution of Civil Engineers and held in Edinburgh on 16 to 18 September 2009. Thomas Telford Ltd. , 696–707.

Yang, J., Low, Y. M., Lee, C.-H., and Chiew, Y.-M. (2018). Numerical simulation of scour around a submarine pipeline using computational fluid dynamics and discrete element method. Appl. Math. Model. 55, 400–416. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2017.10.007

Yeganeh-Bakhtiary, A., EyvazOghli, H., Shabakhty, N., and Abolfathi, S. (2023). Machine learning prediction of wave characteristics: comparison between semi-empirical approaches and DT model. Ocean. Eng. 286 (2), 115583. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.115583

Yeganeh-Bakhtiary, A., EyvazOghli, H., Shabakhty, N., Kamranzad, B., and Abolfathi, S. (2022). Machine learning as a downscaling approach for prediction of wind characteristics under future climate change scenarios. Complexity 2022, 8451812. doi:10.1155/2022/8451812

Yeganeh-Bakhtiary, A., Houshangi, H., and Abolfathi, S. (2020). Lagrangian two-phase flow modeling of scour in front of vertical breakwater. Coast. Eng. J. 62 (2), 252–266. doi:10.1080/21664250.2020.1747140

Zanuttigh, B., Formentin, S. M., and van der Meer, J. W. (2016). Prediction of extreme and tolerable wave overtopping discharges through an advanced neural network. Ocean. Eng. 127, 7–22. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.09.032

www.frontiersin.org

Keywords: random forest, gradient boosted decision trees, Support Vector Machine Regression, marine and coastal management, coastal hazards mitigation, toe scouring, sloping structures

Citation: Habib MA, Abolfathi S, O’Sullivan JJ and Salauddin M (2024) Efficient data-driven machine learning models for scour depth predictions at sloping sea defences. Front. Built Environ. 10:1343398. doi: 10.3389/fbuil.2024.1343398

Received: 23 November 2023; Accepted: 26 January 2024; Published: 09 February 2024.

Reviewed by:

Copyright © 2024 Habib, Abolfathi, O’Sullivan and Salauddin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: M. Salauddin, [email protected]

This article is part of the Research Topic

Recent Developments in Modelling Wave-Structure Interactions at Sea Defences in a Changing Climate

COMMENTS

  1. Amazon.com: Bed Study Table

    1-48 of over 10,000 results for "Bed Study Table" Results Check each product page for other buying options. Price and other details may vary based on product size and color. Overall Pick Foldable Laptop and Bed Table with Storage, Portable Mini Lap Desk for Legs, Ideal for Study, Reading, Picnic, Breakfast,and More 1,371 1K+ bought in past month

  2. Amazon.com: Study Tables For Beds

    1-48 of over 1,000 results for "study tables for beds" Results Check each product page for other buying options. Price and other details may vary based on product size and color. Overall Pick Foldable Laptop and Bed Table with Storage, Portable Mini Lap Desk for Legs, Ideal for Study, Reading, Picnic, Breakfast,and More 1,365

  3. Amazon.com: Student Bed Desk

    Foldable Laptop and Bed Table with Storage, Portable Mini Lap Desk for Legs, Ideal for Study, Reading, Picnic, Breakfast,and More (Pink) 1,343 500+ bought in past month $1999 List: $25.99 FREE delivery Tue, Jan 30 on $35 of items shipped by Amazon More Buying Choices $18.68 (3 used & new offers)

  4. Bed Study Table

    Bed Study Table (1 - 60 of 201 results) Price ($) Shipping All Sellers Sort by: Relevancy Laptop Bed Table,Laptop Bed Tray,Portable Lap Desk,Notebook Table,Laptop table,Table for laptop,Portable table,Study in Bed,Wood Tray (154) $33.56 $41.95 (20% off) Bamboo Laptop/Snack desk, Couch/ bed side table, Moveable Stand in, working/ Studying table.

  5. Bed Study Table

    Showing results for "bed study table" 29,755 Results Recommended Sort by +4 Colors | 2 Sizes Andries Murphy Bed With Desk by Hokku Designs From $1,799.99 $3,499.98 ( 4) Free shipping +2 Colors Dakera Overbed Table with Wheels, 70.8'' Rolling Bed Desk for Queen/Full Size Bed, MDF Panel + Metal Legs by Inbox Zero From $103.99 $133.99 ( 139)

  6. Study Table for Bed

    Study Table for Bed (1 - 60 of 197 results) Price ($) Shipping All Sellers Sort by: Relevancy Personalized Children Lap Tray (106) $28.00 Small Space Solution Murphy Desk, Computer Laptop Desk, Folding Work Desk, Foldable Table, Home Office Study Desk, Apartment Dorm Room Desk (942) $79.90 $99.88 (20% off) Sale ends in 19 minutes FREE shipping

  7. Amazon.in: Study Bed Table

    TRONI Foldable Bed Study Table Portable Wood Multifunction Laptop-Table Lapdesk for Children, Work, Office, Home with Tablet Slot & Cup Holder (Brown & Black, Pack of 1) 1,272 1K+ bought in past month ₹219 M.R.P: ₹599 (63% off) Delivery Fri, 9 Feb

  8. Amazon.in: Study Table On Bed

    Amazon.in: Study Table On Bed 1-16 of over 1,000 results for "study table on bed" Results Price and other details may vary based on product size and colour. TRONI Foldable Bed Study Table Portable Wood Multifunction Laptop-Table Lapdesk for Children, Work, Office, Home with Tablet Slot & Cup Holder (Brown & Black, Pack of 1) 1,162

  9. Laptop Bed Desk : Target

    Sofia + Sam All Purpose Lap Desk Bed Table with Memory Foam - Blue. Sofia + Sam. 1. $40.96. When purchased online. Mount-It! Natural Bamboo Laptop Bed Tray with Tilting Top and Pullout Storage Drawer | Adjustable Breakfast Table with Foldable Design | Eco-Friendly. Mount-It! $37.99.

  10. Amazon.com: Portable Study Table

    Foldable Laptop and Bed Table with Storage, Portable Mini Lap Desk for Legs, Ideal for Study, Reading, Picnic, Breakfast,and More 1,370 1K+ bought in past month $1999 List: $25.99 FREE delivery Wed, Feb 14 on $35 of items shipped by Amazon Or fastest delivery Mon, Feb 12

  11. Portable Laptop Tables Online at Best Prices in India

    Find a laptop table that suits your bed or sofa from a wide range of styles, colors, and features. Compare prices, ratings, and offers from trusted brands like Portronics, StarAndDaisy, and Furn Master. Enjoy discounts, special prices, and no cost EMI on selected items.

  12. Amazon.in: Study Tables For Bed

    Browse a wide range of study tables for bed in various sizes, colours and materials on Amazon.in. Find foldable, portable, ergonomic and multipurpose laptop tables with cup holders, drawers, tablet slots and more features at discounted prices.

  13. Amazon.in: Study Table For Bed

    Find a variety of study tables for bed from different brands, sizes, colours and prices on Amazon.in. Save up to 28% with GST invoice and get bulk discounts on selected products. Compare features, ratings and reviews of laptop tables for bed.

  14. Buy Small Foldable study tables online at Best prices in India

    Find a variety of small foldable study tables online at best prices in India. Choose from different materials, colors, patterns and designs to suit your space and needs. Compare different products and brands and get the best deals on small foldable study tables.

  15. Moscow-Pullman Bedfinders

    Rooms: Whole House only Beds: 2 Baths: 1. Located in the quaint neighborhood of Evergreen Community, this 1600 sq ft host home is located on the South end of Pullman. It is offered as the whole space only with a King bedroom, a full-size bed room, and a futon in the common area. It has a separate entrance and use of the kitchen and garden area.

  16. Tables

    Barn Door Wood Console Table. ( 34) $139.99. $199.99. Add to cart. SALE. IN STORE ONLY. Antique White Wood Tray Table. ( 31)

  17. Amazon.com: Foldable Study Table

    Slendor Laptop Desk Foldable Bed Table Folding Breakfast Tray Portable Lap Standing Desk Notebook Stand Reading Holder for Bed/Couch/Sofa/Floor 3,516 400+ bought in past month $3499 FREE delivery Tue, Feb 13 on $35 of items shipped by Amazon More Buying Choices

  18. Amazon.com: Foldable Laptop and Bed Table with Storage, Portable Mini

    CHEERWELL Foldable Laptop and Bed Table with Storage, Portable Mini Lap Desk for Legs, Ideal for Study, Reading, Picnic, Breakfast,and More(Marble) dummy Mind Reader Lap Desk Laptop Stand, Bed Tray, Folding Legs, Couch Table, Portable, MDF, Metal, 23.5" L x 13.75" W x 10.5" H, Black

  19. I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

    First Moscow State Medical University is a QS World Ranked university by subject ranking #451 - 500, BRICS Ranking #=115 and EECA University Rankings of #154. This is the oldest leading medical university in Russia that has become a cradle of most medical schools and scientific societies. For decades, it has been unofficially known as ...

  20. PDF Medical Analytical System for Moscow City Hospital #31

    Firebird SQL Case Study ... About us Moscow City Hospital #31 is a modern, 620 bed medical institution providing emergency and in-patient medical services with a staff of over 400. The hospital is equipped with ... Firebird's whole "active tables" concept, which allows its triggers to "mutate data", and provide the necessary control of data ...

  21. Efficient data-driven machine learning models for scour depth

    The SVMR algorithm's regularization parameter is represented by the C term in Table 1. The algorithm's "engine" is a function called the kernel that maps input parameters (independent variables) onto output values (dependent variable). This study investigates the performance of linear, polynomial and RBF kernels.

  22. Study Bed Table

    Home bed table for laptop or a cosy breakfast-in-bed tray | Study Table | Hand-Painted Mango Wood Multipurpose Table | Mango Wood table (1) $ 186.91. FREE shipping Add to Favorites Victorian Parlor Table (46) $ 790.00. FREE shipping Add to Favorites Gray Chevron Table Runner, Bed Runner, Buffet Runner, Table Linen, Wedding Table Runner, Banquet ...

  23. Amazon.com: Folding Table For Study

    Folding Laptop Table, Bed Table Lap Desk, Breakfast Tray Table, Portable Mini Picnic Study Reading Drawing Table, Folding in Half with Inner Storage Space (Dark Grey) ... Foldable Student Study Tables for Small Space, Walnut. Options: 2 sizes. 4.6 out of 5 stars. 1,000. $85.19 $ 85. 19.